Tag Archives: Film Review

music, Netflix, Reviews

Netflix Film Review: Emilia Perez (2024) – A Trans-formative song of Risk and Redemption!

Leave a comment

NETFLIX FILM REVIEW: EMILIA PEREZ (2024)

Directed by Jacques Audiard

Screenplay by Jacques Audiard

Based on Écoute by Boris Razon

Produced by Jacques Audiard, Pascal Caucheteux, Valérie Schermann, Anthony Vaccarello

Main Cast: Zoe Saldaña, Karla Sofía Gascón, Selena Gomez, Adriana Paz, Mark Ivanir, Édgar Ramírez etc.

Cinematography by Paul Guilhaume

*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***

“There’s such a thing as having too much going on.” Howard Moon from The Mighty Boosh.

I am a big champion of the films of Jacques Audiard. When his eccentric Western, The Sisters Brothers (2018), was released I wrote a positive review and tribute to several other fine films he has directed here. Audiard likes to take risks representing human beings on the edge of society and perhaps struggling with life; people who often make left-field decisions to improve or escape their existential plight. With his latest film Emilia Perez (2024) the filmmaking master challenges the audience again with a multi-blended genre film that also contains powerful themes of transformation, redemption, violence, crime and family values. Oh and there are songs too.

The narrative begins strongly as Rita Mora Castro (Zoe Saldana), a fiercely talented yet overlooked lawyer in Mexico City, finds herself thrust into the spotlight when she defends the wife of a prominent media mogul in a controversial murder trial. Despite her misgivings, Rita crafts a chillingly persuasive argument that frames the death as a suicide, securing an unexpected victory in the case—one that leaves her both celebrated and haunted.

As the dust settles, Rita’s restless dissatisfaction with her life grows louder. Then comes an anonymous phone call: an enigmatic voice offers her a chance at something extraordinary—and extraordinarily dangerous. Intrigued and desperate for change, she agrees to a clandestine meeting. The mysterious client turns out to be none other than Juan “Manitas” Del Monte (Karla Sofía Gascón), a ruthless and feared cartel kingpin. But the request they make isn’t what Rita expects from a crime-lord. Manitas dreams of living authentically by undergoing gender-affirming surgery and becoming a woman. Rita must decide: will she help Manitas rewrite their story, or will she risk becoming the next chapter in a tale of betrayal and bloodshed?

This fascinating set-up draws you in and I believe if Audiard’s narrative had concentrated mostly on the relationship between Rita, the transitioned, Emilia, then the film would have retained much emotional and thematic power. Yet, after Emilia’s operation the screenplay introduces several other story strands and characters to take in, including Selena Gomez’ feisty Jessi Del Monte, Manitas’ ex-wife who thinks “he’s” dead. This development works initially but then Audiard hurls so many more ideas and genres at the audience wall, not all of them sticking.

Admittedly, the film’s audacious blend of melodrama, crime, thriller, musical, and comedy creates an unpredictable and frenetic narrative that keeps viewers on their toes. However, this constant genre-shifting can undermine the weight of its core themes—gender and identity—by overshadowing them with spectacle and tonal inconsistency. The story’s rapid turns and refusal to settle into a single emotional or narrative groove risk, arguably trivializing the profound struggles and triumphs of its trans-protagonist. Moments that could serve as deeply reflective or cathartic explorations of gender identity are sometimes undercut by abrupt pivots into slapstick humor or hyper-stylized action. While these shifts might aim to reflect the disarray and fluidity of identity in a chaotic world, they can also dilute the thematic resonance.

At the same time, it’s clear Audiard is deliberately embracing this chaos and analysis of human flaws. The fractured tone might symbolize a world where stability and clarity are illusions, mirroring the internal and external conflicts of someone navigating personal transformation in an unyielding environment. This approach, while conceptually intriguing, can feel alienating. Nonetheless, the cast’s stellar performances anchor the film, ensuring that the characters remain compelling even when the story spirals into excess. Lastly, Emilia Perez‘ (2024) relentless energy often leaves little room for introspection, and whether this genre-chaos enriches or undermines the narrative depends largely on the viewer’s tolerance for Audiard’s embrace of choral disorder in a world seemingly allergic to calm and pattern.

Mark: 7.5 out of 11

Cinema, New Releases, Reviews

Cinema Review: Gladiator II – an Epic Sequel that Echoes the original in Eternity

Leave a comment

CINEMA REVIEW: GLADIATOR II (2024)

Directed by Ridley Scott

Screenplay by David Scarpa

Story by Peter Craig, David Scarpa

Based on Characters by David Franzoni

Produced by Ridley Scott, Michael Pruss, Douglas Wick, Lucy Fisher, Walter F. Parkes, Laurie MacDonald and David Franzoni.

Main cast: Paul Mescal, Pedro Pascal, Joseph Quinn, Fred Hechinger, Lior Raz, Derek Jacobi, Connie Nielsen and Denzel Washington.

Cinematography by John Mathieson

*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***

Ridley Scott’s Gladiator (2000) stands as a modern genre classic, redefining the historical epic with its visceral storytelling, evocative visual style, and emotional depth. The film not only revitalized interest in the sword-and-sandal genre but also solidified Russell Crowe as a major star, earning him an Academy Award for Best Actor. Crowe’s portrayal of Maximus Decimus Meridius—a betrayed Roman general seeking justice—exudes both raw power and profound vulnerability, making him an enduring figure in cinematic history.

Gladiator’s superb screenplay intricately followed the structure of Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey, charting Maximus’ transformation from a celebrated general to a fallen slave, and ultimately to a venerated martyr. Also invoking the archetype of one of Christopher Booker’s seven basic plots, ‘Overcoming the Monster’. Indeed, Maximus’ journey aligns with the ‘Overcoming the Monster’ archetype, where the hero confronts a seemingly insurmountable evil. Commodus and the Roman Empire embodies the “monster,” wielding unchecked power, moral corruption, and cruelty. Maximus battles not only physical opponents in the gladiatorial arena but also the corrupt system that Commodus represents. His ultimate triumph over Commodus is both personal vengeance and symbolic justice, restoring balance to a fractured world.

Finding Ridley Scott at arguably the height of his directorial power, Gladiator’s success rested on its ability to blend archetypal storytelling with deeply human emotions. It revitalized the historical epic for modern audiences by prioritizing character-driven drama over spectacle, though its battle sequences remain iconic. With its sweeping Hans Zimmer score and Russell Crowe’s unforgettable performance, the film transcended its genre, made a lot of money and become a modern myth that continues to resonate with audiences worldwide. So, the burning question is why did it take so to make a sequel?

I’d say the answer to this question is that because the original was so iconic and powerful it didn’t need a sequel. Still, when has that ever stopped the money-making behemoth of the Hollywood machine from not following up. The surprise is that it took twenty-four years to bring to the screen. Which is a similar length of time after the first one that Gladiator II (2024) is set, namely 211AD. Similarities do not cease there.

So, I will just say I had so much fun watching Gladiator II. It is an exhilarating return to the grandeur of the Roman Empire, delivering breathtaking visuals, high-stakes action, and a muscular lead performance from Paul Mescal as Hanno, a fighter with a mysterious history. However, despite its ambitious scale and technical brilliance, the sequel draws heavy parallels to the original, feeling more like a reimagining than a bold continuation. Hanno’s journey echoes Maximus’ so closely that it lacks the freshness that made the 2000 film a groundbreaking modern epic.

Indeed, Hanno’s arc is essentially a mirror image of Maximus’ but while Gladiator II adheres to the same Hero’s Journey structure that defined the first film, the beats feel overly familiar. Hanno’s transformation, while compelling, doesn’t quite reach the mythic resonance of Maximus’ odyssey. Where Maximus was a reluctant hero drawn into a larger-than-life struggle, Hanno’s motivations and journey feel more cloudy and contrived, lacking the gravitas of the original’s moral and emotional complexity. Script and character inconsistencies do not help, with Hanno too quickly switching emotions where Connie Nielsen’s Lucilla is concerned.

That said, the sequel contains many strengths. The world-building is as immersive as ever, with Ridley Scott’s regal direction ensuring that every frame pulsates with life and detail. The sheer energy and brutality of the Colosseum set-pieces are worth the admission alone. The flooding of the arena battle and introduction of a number of fantastic and vicious beasts are especially memorable. The action is bloody and gripping, the score soars, and the themes of resilience and justice remain timeless. Moreover, Mescal delivers a commanding performance, injecting moments of raw intensity and vulnerability into the role.

Having said that, it is Denzel Washington’s Macrinus who pulls narrative focus and power throughout. Washington brings his trademark gravitas and charisma to the role, crafting a character arc that is both morally complex and emotionally resonant. Macrinus’ journey of manipulation, becomes the film’s most compelling thread, overshadowing Hanno’s more conventional hero’s path. Washington imbues Macrinus with subtlety, allowing audiences to see flashes of vulnerability and moral conflict beneath his stoic exterior. He oscillates effortlessly between commanding authority and quiet introspection, making every line delivery impact. Washington’s natural charisma ensures that Macrinus commands attention in every scene. His dialogue crackles with intensity, and his moments of silence speak volumes, often eclipsing Hanno’s more straightforward emotional beats.

Gladiator II undeniably thrills as a cinematic experience, but its adherence to the original’s blueprint leaves it struggling to step out of Maximus’ shadow. While it showcases the enduring power of its core narrative themes, it ultimately feels more like a polished homage than a groundbreaking sequel, relying on echoes of past triumphs rather than forging an entirely new path. For fans of the original, this familiarity is a strength and weakness, yet nonetheless Scott’s epic facsimile remains a powerful and bone-crunching adrenaline rush.

Mark: 8 out of 11

horror, New Releases, Reviews

Cinema Review: Heretic (2024) – A Devilish Twist on Religious Horror

1 Comment

Heretic (2024)

Directed by Scott Beck & Bryan Woods

Written by Scott Beck & Bryan Woods

Produced by Stacey Sher, Scott Beck, Bryan Woods, Julia Glausi and Jeanette Volturno

Main cast: Hugh Grant, Sophie Thatcher, Chloe East and Topher Grace.

Cinematography by Chung Chung-hoon

Hugh Grant has been leaning into edgier, more complex roles in recent years, breaking away from the charming, rom-com archetype that first made him famous in films like Notting Hill (1999) and Four Weddings and a Funeral (1994). His performance as the scheming Fletcher in The Gentlemen (2019) showcased his versatility and willingness to play morally ambiguous, darker characters, a notable shift from his earlier, more likeable characters. Additionally, his involvement in projects like Heretic (2024) demonstrates a continued exploration of grittier, layered personas, signaling a reinvention of his career as he embraces unconventional, often villainous roles that display a new level of depth and unpredictability.

In the theologically-driven horror thriller, Heretic (2024), he portrays a certain Mr Reed, who is door-stepped by two Mormon missionary’s, Sister Barnes (Sophie Thatcher) and Sister Paxton (Chloe East). After the opening scenes which establish empathy for the Mormons, despite some slightly risque dialogue, they knock on the door of Mr Reed and soon the tension begins to rise as he clearly has ulterior motives. But what could they be?

The excellent script by Scott Beck and Bryan Woods truly comes alive in the second act, diving into a sharp, intelligent critique on the nature of religion and faith. The narrative shifts into thought-provoking territory, dissecting the contradictions and complexities of belief systems with nuance and wit. Hugh Grant, delivers these lines with palpable relish, embodying a character that’s both captivating and unsettling. His performance amplifies the script’s incisive commentary, bringing a darkly charismatic edge to the film’s anti-treatise that leaves a lasting impression on the viewer. There’s some great humour in there too, even name-checking South Park and The Book of Mormon during a thrilling game of verbal cat-and-mouse as Mr Reed challenges the sweet missionaries’ whole doctrine. Which, let’s face it, as invented by Joseph Smith, is arguably founded on many ridiculous ideas.

Heretic loses some of its originality toward the end as it leans into familiar horror and “final girl” tropes, diluting the impact of its earlier, more mazy, twisted and thought-provoking narrative. After building a layered critique on religion and faith, the climax reverts to predictable genre conventions, somewhat undermining the complexity established in the second act. This shift might feel like a missed opportunity, as the nuanced themes give way to traditional horror cliches that prioritize shocks over substance. While still entertaining, the reliance on these tropes makes the conclusion feel less daring compared to the film’s more intellectually ambitious setup. Still, Hugh Grant’s devilish Mr Reed and a fantastic soundtrack, make it well worth the admission fee. Meanwhile Woods and Beck again prove themselves as genre filmmakers worth keeping faith with.

Mark: 8.5 out of 11

Cinema, Cult Cinema, documentaries

BFI Film Review: Scala (2023) – At the Altar of Nostalgia for the Scala Cinema!

1 Comment

BFI Film Review: Scala!!! (2023)

Directed by Ali Catterall & Jane Giles

Produced by Andrew Starke, Alan Marke & Jim Reid

Cinematography by Sarah Appleton

Edited by Andrew Starke and Edward Mills

Music by Barry Adamson

The Scala Cinema, nestled in the heart of London, was more than just a film theatre; it was a refuge, a haven for anyone with a passion for films that didn’t fit into the mainstream mold. I can still feel the sticky floors, the cats in the dark, hear the muffled sounds of the trains passing overhead, and see the hazy red glow that filled the theater. In the 1980s and 1990s, going to the Scala wasn’t just about watching a film; it was about being part of a community that celebrated the bizarre, the boundary-pushing, and the boldly artistic.

During those years, the Scala felt like my second home. It was where I could disappear into films that I couldn’t find anywhere else – obscure horror flicks, campy B-movies, gonzo-pornos, arthouse selections, and controversial classics from around the globe. It was my church. Films by David Lynch, John Waters, Yuen Woo-ping, Derek Jarman, Werner Herzog, Sam Raimi, Lucio Fulci, Russ Meyer, Kathryn Bigelow, Alex Cox, John Woo, Stanley Kubrick, Jane Campion, Orson Welles, Dario Argento, Alejandro Jodorowsky and many more – each screening felt like a small rebellion, a discovery that I’d carry with me. The Scala didn’t just show movies; it curated experiences. All-night marathons, double bills, and surprise screenings became a staple of my weekends, filling my mind with scenes that blurred the line between reality and the outrageous.

When I watched the Scala documentary on BFI Player, a flood of memories came rushing back. It was as though I’d been given a ticket back to those wild, late nights. I remembered how Scala regulars would shout lines at the screen or break into laughter at inopportune moments, making each viewing unique and unpredictable. The documentary captured not only the films but the spirit of the place – the staff who loved cinema as much as the patrons did, the strange but welcoming crowd, and the sense that Scala wasn’t just a venue but a movement. Watching it felt like reconnecting with a part of myself, an era when cinema was raw, thrilling, and unpolished.

The Scala in King’s Cross is a legend, and for those of us who were lucky enough to experience it, it’s a chapter we’ll always cherish. I was even there when they showed A Clockwork Orange (illegally), which led to the ill-fated court case which forced it to close. This documentary is both a valuable historical document and a joyous sharing of stories from those who worked there and attended the films shown, including: Mark Moore, Mary Harron, Isaac Julien, John Waters, Ben Wheatley; Barry Adamson, Matt Johnson, Adam Buxton, James O’Brien, Stewart Lee, Lisa Power and Graham Humphreys. Overall, the Scala Cinema wasn’t just about the films we watched; it was about finding a place where film became more than entertainment – they were a way of life.

Mark: 9 out of 11

Cinema, Reviews

Cinema Review – Exploring Music and Madness in Joker: Folie à Deux (2024)

4 Comments

Cinema Review: Joker: Folie à Deux (2024)

Directed by Todd Phillips

Written by Scott Silver and Todd Phillips (Based on Characters by DC Comics)

Produced byTodd Phillips, Emma Tillinger Koskoff & Joseph Garner

Main cast: Joaquin Phoenix, Lady Gaga, Brendan Gleeson, Catherine Keener and Zazie Beetz etc.

Cinematography by Lawrence Sher

Music by Hildur Guðnadóttir

*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***

In 2019, Todd Phillips and Joaquin Phoenix, as director and lead actor, unleashed Joker (2019) on the cinema public. It became an enormous critical and commercial hit, with Phoenix winning the ‘Best Actor’ award at the Academy Awards. Unsurprisingly, a sequel now reaches us. While the original 1980’s set period drama worked superbly, echoing the structure and themes of Scorsese’s King of Comedy (1982) and Taxi Driver (1976), the follow-up Joker: Folie à Deux (2024) is altogether different. In fact, given it experiments with musical, romance, crime, court-room and psychological horror genres, it is an altogether riskier film, which while compelling and fascinating, doesn’t always connect to a satisfactory whole. But perhaps that is the point. It is intended to reflect an inconsistent mind and unreliable narrator, a fractured soul in Arthur Fleck.

For me, in Joker: Folie à Deux (2024), Todd Phillips masterfully employs cinematic techniques of fragmentation and ambiguity to deepen the exploration of mental illness, echoing the disorienting and fractured experience of his protagonists. The film, much like its predecessor, blurs the lines between reality and delusion, but this time the ambiguity is intensified through musical elements, dreamlike sequences, and multiple perspectives. Phillips’ use of disjointed timelines and unreliable narratives immerses the audience in the chaos of Arthur Fleck’s (Phoenix) and Harley Quinn’s (Lady Gaga) unraveling psyches.

The musical numbers, set against stark, gritty environments, feel both fantastical and unnerving, reinforcing the characters’ distorted perceptions of the world. Moments of quiet introspection are suddenly broken by violent outbursts or surreal interludes, mimicking the unpredictability of their mental states. The film’s visual style shifts between stark realism and surreal imagery, reflecting the internal fragmentation of Arthur and Harley’s minds, keeping viewers on edge and questioning what is real.

Phillips’ direction ensures that the story remains rooted in ambiguity—much like the first film—inviting viewers to interpret the characters’ mental states without offering clear answers. This cracked narrative style doesn’t just illustrate their mental illness; it pulls the audience into it, making Joker: Folie à Deux a bold and unsettling exploration of madness through form as much as story. As such there isn’t much plot to speak of as Arthur’s journey essentially follows him from Arkham Asylum to court, with episodic splashes of song and dance in between, before we get to the climactic court room scenes.

As aforementioned, in Joker (2019), Todd Phillips drew heavily from Martin Scorsese’s The King of Comedy (1982), particularly in its portrayal of a lonely, unstable man seeking fame and validation in a world that cruelly rejects him. Arthur Fleck’s obsession with talk show host Murray Franklin mirrors Rupert Pupkin’s fixation on becoming a comedy star, and both films explore the dangerous consequences of societal alienation and delusional aspirations. The gritty, urban backdrop and character-driven narrative made Joker a powerful homage to Scorsese’s psychological explorations of fame and madness.

With Joker: Folie à Deux (2024), Phillips shifts toward a different Scorsese film for inspiration: New York, New York (1977). Much like Scorsese’s semi-musical about a turbulent romance between two performers, Folie à Deux integrates musical elements and centres on the chaotic relationship between Arthur and Harley Quinn (Lady Gaga). The film’s blending of harsh realism with the stylized, dreamlike sequences of musical numbers echoes New York, New York’s mix of glitzy performance and dark personal struggle. Thematically, both films explore how dreams of stardom can clash with mental instability, but Folie à Deux takes it a step further by embedding this conflict within its characters’ delusions, making the musical sequences feel like an escape from—or reflection of—their psychotic minds. This potential homage to New York, New York allows Phillips to expand Joker‘s cinematic language, fusing psychological drama with surreal musical spectacle.

Joker: Folie à Deux (2024), at time of writing, has polarized critics and cinema-goers. As someone who watches a lot of “art-house” and European cinema, I can see why this film is dividing opinion. This is what happens if Jacques Demy, by way of Bergman, were given $200 million to make a DC comic-book film. Todd Phillips takes many risks in form and structure, most notably denying the audience catharsis at the bleak finale. It is truly downbeat and it felt like Phillips and Phoenix were finally done with this clownish killer and anti-hero.

As a cinematic experience the musical score is striking. Moreover, the production is grey and oppressive and claustrophobic, set in enclosed cells and shadowed court rooms. There is little light in this film nor even a shadow at the end of the tunnel for Arthur and Harley. Phoenix is fantastic again, while Gaga’s romantic partner-in-crime is under-cooked as a character. Nonetheless, Gaga still sparkles amidst this gloomy, musical, existential journey into the mouth and down the throat of madness.

Mark: 8.5 out of 11

Cinema, horror, MUBI, Reviews

Cinema Review: The Substance (2024) – A Dark Exploration of Identity

3 Comments

THE SUBSTANCE (2024)

Directed by Coralie Fargeat

Written by Coralie Fargeat

Produced by: Coralie Fargeat, Tim Bevan and Eric Fellner

Main Cast: Demi Moore, Margaret Qualley and Dennis Quaid

Cinematography by Benjamin Kracun

*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***

The Substance (2024), directed by Coralie Fargeat, is a visually striking and visceral film that pushes the boundaries of body horror and psychological terror. Fargeat, known for her raw and relentless style in Revenge (2017), once again delivers an unforgettable experience by weaving references to classic literature and horror cinema into a narrative that is at once familiar and entirely original.

Demi Moore portrays a former Hollywood star, Elizabeth Sparkle, now relegated to doing a mildy successful cable TV aerobics show. However, Dennis Quaid’s oily production executive is on the lookout for younger talent. Elizabeth soon finds herself on the media scrapheap. Desperate to regain her youth and career, Elizabeth is drawn to the hypnotic promise of a new product called ‘The Substance.’

Before you can say, “Dorian Gray”, Elizabeth is lured to a strange white room full of lockers and has committed to the process. Similar to Gremlins (1984), there are rules to follow. As she follows the steps and injects the potions, Elizabeth goes through a painful and incredibly impactful transformation process. She literally gives birth to a young and beautiful alter ego called, Sue (Margaret Qualley). Elizabeth and Sue then get seven days each to live their life before they have to swap back. What could go wrong?

The film’s core themes draw heavily from Robert Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, exploring duality, identity, and the monstrous potential hidden within human nature. Like Stevenson’s tale of inner conflict, The Substance delves into the consequences of scientific ambition. It investigates moral transgression but with a modern, feminist twist. Fargeat’s use of body horror, particularly in the transformation sequences, echoes the grotesque, unsettling work of David Cronenberg. The nightmarish atmosphere and surreal visuals are reminiscent of David Lynch’s unsettling dream logic. This is notably seen in Eraserhead (1977) and Mulholland Drive (2001).

The film also pays homage to John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982), with its transmogrifying frights, sense of creeping paranoia and rising conflict. But rather than a group of men fighting each other Elizabeth and Sue turn on each other over ownership of their physical existence and Hollywood status. The final act descends into hellish and bloody satire echoing Peter Jackson’s Braindead (1992), with gore galore. Moreover, Stanley Kubrick’s influence is palpable in the film’s meticulous framing, production design and tension-building. The climactic body-morphing scenes, however, most clearly nod to Brian Yuzna’s Society (1989), with its grotesque depictions of class and conformity, fused with Fargeat’s unique vision of female empowerment, revenge and resistance.

The Substance (2024) feels like a bigger budget film in look and style, but you soon realise the minimal number of sets used and a lack of crowd scenes, finds the narrative effectively becoming a two-hander in the middle act by focusing on Sue and Elizabeth’s internal retaliatory vindictiveness. There are some amazing framing, colour design and cinematographic choices as showers become tombs to trap the protagonists. The book-ended Hollywood star montage and returning final shots are imaginative and unforgettable. Got to say that Demi Moore, as an actress taking on a role of an aging and neurotic former star is genius casting. While Qualley delivers a sexually charged and energetic performance, it is Moore who carries the weight of the complex themes as Elizabeth’s journey dives deeper into the stuff of nightmares.

Overall, The Substance (2024) is a postmodern classic and a film that honors its influences while forging its own path. Fargeat uses these references to enrich the narrative, creating a damned ugly and beautiful satire on those seeking narcissistic perfection through unnatural means, ultimately paying the price of those seeking eternal youth and fame.

Mark: 9 out of 11

Cinema, New Releases, Reviews, Shudder

HORROR REVIEWS: SPEAK NO EVIL (2022) / SPEAK NO EVIL (2024)

Leave a comment

SPEAK NO EVIL (2022)

Directed by Christian Tafdrup

Written by Christian Tafdrup and Mads Tafdrup

Main Cast: Morten Burian, Sidsel Siem Koch, Fedja van Huêt, Karina Smulders, Liva Forsberg and Marius Damslev.

Speak No Evil (2022), directed by Christian Tafdrup, is a chilling psychological horror that explores the perils of politeness within middle-class sensibilities, turning everyday discomfort into a waking nightmare. The film follows a Danish family with a young daughter, visiting a Dutch family unit, only to find themselves trapped in a horrifying and twisted game of cat and mouse. All smiles and charisma at first, the ‘Alpha’ Patrick, dominates his wife and young son, who unfortunately has no tongue. Tafdrup deftly dissects how the fear of offending others—deeply ingrained in bourgeois values—leads the protagonists to ignore increasingly unsettling behaviour.

Losing or not using one’s voice is inherent within the text. Further, what begins as awkward social tension escalates into something far more sinister, as the family is manipulated through their desire to maintain decorum. This dynamic plays on the anxieties of modern, polite society, where confrontation is often avoided at all costs. The film’s climax delivers a shocking, almost biblical punishment for their inability to break free from these conventions, suggesting a moral reckoning for those who allow fear of impoliteness to override survival instincts.

Subtle, creeping dread makes Speak No Evil (2022) a disturbing meditation on the dangers of middle-class complacency, and the terrifying consequences of choosing politeness over personal safety. Lastly, the film also explores the theme of toxic masculinity as the muscular ‘Alpha’ threatens the ineffective ‘Beta’ male, proving one should always stand up to bullies or face the consequences.

(Note: for those seeking out the film in the UK, it is currently screening on Shudder.)

Mark: 8.5 out of 11

SPEAK NO EVIL (2024)

Directed by James Watkins

Screenplay adaptation by James Watkins

Main cast: James McAvoy , Mackenzie Davis, Scoot McNairy, Alix West Lefler, Dan Hough, and Aisling Franciosi

The English remake of Speak No Evil (2024) delivers a faithful and unnerving adaptation of Christian Tafdrup’s original, with James McAvoy’s chilling performance at its heart. McAvoy, playing the charming yet menacing antagonist, brings a sinister edge to the character that heightens the tension and discomfort throughout the film. His portrayal effortlessly captures the unsettling power dynamics, making each of his polite gestures and subtle manipulations all the more terrifying. McEvoy relishes every moment of this characterful performance.

What truly stands out in this remake is how it retains the meticulous craftsmanship of the original. The film carefully balances tension, awkwardness, and psychological dread, maintaining the slow-burn atmosphere that made the Danish version so unsettling. Director James Watkins ensures the pacing and visual style honour Tafdrup’s vision, with each shot and interaction loaded with unease. Watkin’s adaptation also provides further exposition and fleshes out the character dynamics and motivations, notably with the children, whose actions are integral to propelling the narrative thrills.

The Cape Fear (1991)-style climax veers away from the original’s more subtle, thought-provoking and bleak ending. However, it further amplifies the anxiety, offering a nerve-shredding confrontation that feels both inevitable and brutal. The remake pays homage to the original’s themes of social etiquette, hidden danger and finding one’s voices against bullies, while delivering a climactic showdown that mirrors the power struggles found in classic thrillers. Overall, like the original Speak No Evil (2024) successfully inverts the home invasion dynamic, making it a worthy, terrifying and almost necessary remake.

Mark: 8.5 out of 11

Cinema, Netflix, Reviews

NETFLIX FILM REVIEW: HIT MAN (2023)

Leave a comment

Directed by Richard Linklater

Screenplay by Richard Linklater & Glen Powell

Based on “Hit Man” by Skip Hollandsworth

Produced by Mike Blizzard, Richard Linklater, Glen Powell, Jason Bateman & Michael Costigan

Main Cast: Glen Powell, Adria Arjona, Austin Amelio, Retta, Sanjay Rao, etc.

Cinematography by Shane F. Kelly

*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***

Hollywood has a history of attempting to mold certain actors into the next big film stars, often casting them in high-profile projects with hopes of catapulting them to stardom. Colin Farrell was positioned as a leading man with roles in blockbuster films like Minority Report (2002), Alexander (2004) and S.W.A.T. (2003), but despite his undeniable talent, he didn’t quite become the A-list fixture studios envisioned. Having said that Farrell has proved himself an actor of high esteem, choosing to work with some of the best directors around in Yorgos Lanthimos and Martin McDonagh.

Similarly, Sam Worthington was thrust into the spotlight with Avatar (2009) and Terminator Salvation (2009), yet struggled to keep his star power afterward. Likewise, Taylor Kitsch, Hayden Christensen, Jai Courtney, Kate Mara and Daisy Ridley were also groomed for stardom. While Ridley achieved significant recognition, sustaining that momentum outside of the galaxy far, far away has proven difficult, Cara Delevingne has found the transition from supermodel to actress somewhat challenging. Enter stage centre, Glen Powell, who is arguably the latest actor the Hollywood machine is pushing for global stardom.

Powell is a handsome, charming and intelligent actor with a winning smile who certainly carries the romance and comedic elements of Hit Man (2023) extremely well. He portrays Gary Johnson, a mild-mannered professor of Psychology and Philosophy at the University of New Orleans who also assists the New Orleans Police Department in undercover sting operations. Usually working behind the operations providing advice, Gary is suddenly thrust into the action and has to play a fake hit-man to bring a suspect down. While this set-up stretched legal credulity, we eventually learn that the events are based on a “true” story. No doubt some liberties have been taken with the source material.

Gary’s character development finds him becoming very successful as an undercover operator, taking on a series of disguises and inventing precise alter egos to match the psychological make-up of those he is trying to trap. Hit Man (2023) is a kind of “ugly duckling” story where the ‘Alpha’ identity Gary invents ultimately takes over his own ‘Beta’ personality. The romantic element of the narrative comes via the beautiful and troubled, Madison (Adria Arjona), who desires to kill her abusive boyfriend, Ray. Tasked with bringing her to justice, Gary contrives to give her a second chance, but when Ray turns up dead, Gary’s whole existence and secret identity comes under threat. While this sounds like the plot to a really compelling thriller, overall there is a lighter touch to the direction and much humour. Further, Powell’s on-screen chemistry with Arjona is convincing and sizzles throughout.

I really enjoyed Hit Man (2023). It’s familiar and conventionally structured, but has a smart genre script and winning performances from the charismatic and sexy leads. Lastly, Richard Linklater is a rare filmmaker who seamlessly navigates between art-house cinema and more commercial projects, maintaining his distinctive voice across both realms. Hit Man (2023) finds him in more crowd-pleasing territory as he was with the fantastic School of Rock (2003). Yet, will Powell ultimately become a box office success and bona fide movie star? Well, I guess with this film, the recently released, Twisters (2024), the upcoming Huntington (2025) and Edgar Wright directed, The Running Man (2025), he is well on his way.

Mark: 8 out of 11

Cinema, horror, Reviews

CINEMA REVIEW: LONGLEGS (2024)

2 Comments

CINEMA REVIEW: LONGLEGS (2024)

Directed by Osgood Perkins

Written by Osgood Perkins

Produced by Dan Kagan, Brian Kavanaugh-Jones, Nicolas Cage, Dave Caplan, Chris Ferguson etc.

Main Cast: Maika Monroe, Blair Underwood, Alicia Witt, Nicolas Cage, etc.

Cinematography by Andrés Arochi

*** THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS ***

As a no-budget filmmaker I have often written and produced scripts which arguably had plots and concepts that were under-served by the lack of funds. The low budget meant one’s production values suffered on screen and did not allow the requisite number of shoot days to do the finished script justice. I felt similar vibes watching Longlegs (2024), as filmmaker Osgood Perkins attempts a FBI procedural thriller on less-than-$10 million dollars. The sparseness of the production and minimal cast kind of works in its’ favour, as Perkins goes for an ultra-violent-Twin-Peaks-meets-economy-Fincher vibe, ultimately ending up with a incredibly strange brew indeed.

Maika Monroe is FBI agent, Lee Harker, investigating a series of inexplicable murder-suicides during the 1990’s. In terms of structure the breadcrumb plotting is not the films’ strength but it does allow the director to hang a whole load of janky peculiarities on the screen. Harker’s keen empathy and apparent sixth-sense bring her ever closer to a suspect who goes by the name of ‘Longlegs’. Yet, the killer is not related to a spider, but rather reminded me of Noel Fielding meets the monster from parodic film-within-a-TV-show, Doctor and the Pencil. Surprisingly, and you will not believe this, the weirdo killer, Longlegs, is portrayed weirdly by Nicolas Cage, who revels in the wig and prosthetics and is, did I say already, the height of weirdness.

Osgood Perkins directed one of the dullest horror films I have ever seen in the experimental, I Am the Pretty Thing That Lives in the House (2016). But Longlegs (2024) is a massive improvement with some chilling and suspenseful scenes, and a decent lead performance from Agent Starling-alike, Maika Monroe. Similar to Carol Morley’s Out of Blue (2018), this is an arthouse director taking on genre filmmaking without enough cash and getting it deliberately wrong. Overall, with a very strong first half, Longlegs (2024), latterly takes some insane plot turns involving Faustian pacts, parental abuse, religious mania, hypnosis and voodoo sci-fi concepts which don’t really meld but remain thematically fascinating. Cage portraying Noel Fielding as an oddball killer, as well as many fantastic on-screen deaths, definitely give this cult cinematic stew strong and curious limbs.

Mark: 7.5 out of 11

Cinema, horror, Netflix

NETFLIX REVIEWS: HORROR!

Leave a comment

NETFLIX REVIEWS: HORROR!

As regular readers of my blog will know I am a massive fan of horror films. So much so I will often theme my monthly viewing around the genre, then consolidate the reviews in one post. Here are two of the most recent posts:

HORROR OBSCURA FILM REVIEWS – HALLOWEEN 2021 SPECIAL!
13 HORROR FILMS FOR CHRISTMAS – Some alternative festive reviews!

For the month of June and bleeding into July, I solely focused on horror films streaming on Netflix. So, here are short reviews of the many films I watched that are currently available on Netflix!

*** CONTAINS PLOT SPOILERS ***

A CLASSIC HORROR STORY (2021)

Italian shocker that echoes Midsommar (2019), Scream 3 (2000) and The Ritual (2017). The script is meta-clever and there’s some decent gore, but overall it lacks emotional empathy for the characters. More of a knowing film satire rather than being proper scary. Mark: 6.5 out of 11

BAGHEAD (2023)

Suffers in comparison to the far more energetic and thrilling Talk to Me (2022) – which is also on Netflix. Aside from the opening with the always brilliant Peter Mullan, who sets the scene, monster and horror rules, the film contains slight characterization and low stakes when the lead protagonists enter the shadowed fray. Mark: 5.5 out of 11

BLOODY NEW YEAR (1987)

Genuinely one of the worst horror films EVER made, that somehow still has some memorably crazy moments and monsters. Watch and cry with laughter about how bad this Brit-shocker is though! Mark: 2 out of 11

CAM (2018)

Madeline Brewer is fantastic as the narcissistic Cam-Girl who finds her identity is cloned, with the added stress of a killer being on her trail. Cleverly and wittily plotted, this brilliantly directed satire rises above its exploitative material to deliver a thematically rich horror film full of suspense and shocks. Mark: 8.5 out of 11

CREEP 2 (2017)

Mark Duplass gives another strikingly weird performance as the serial killer who loves the slow-burn taunting of his victims. Both this and Creep (2015) actually make the found footage filming trope work really well. Mark: 7.5 out of 11

EMELIE (2016)

What if your babysitter isn’t the person you think they are? An incredibly chilling character study designed to give every parent sleepless nights. With a committed performance from Sarah Bolger, this has so many twisted scenes involving the kids that disturbed me and feared for their safety. A horror film that really burrows under your skin throughout. Mark: 7.5 out of 11.

FANTASY ISLAND (2020)

Taking a 1970’s high-concept drama series and turning it into a horror film is not the worst idea, especially as the original series had its darker episodes often involving cautionary tales of morality. However, the script they delivered for this misfire feels as though many, many writers have tried desperately to resuscitate it from within the cold morgue draw. There’s some drive and energy from the cast and I actually enjoyed some of the set-pieces, but it feels ultimately like over-stuffed mush. Mark: 5 out of 11.

HAUNT (2019)

An incredibly generic set-up finds a group of teenagers drawn to a haunted house at Halloween, only for crazed killers to lock them in a slash them down. Benefits from some imaginative villains and kills, plus an empathetic lead characterization by Katie Stevens as the grieving Harper. Lastly, directors Scott Beck and Bryan Woods show excellent control over tone, style and suspense. Mark: 7.5 out of 11.

RED STATE (2011)

Kevin Smith goes ‘Grindhouse’ with this gnarly horror film where a group of horny teenagers are lured into a deadly trap that threatens their existence. Starts strongly exploring themes of religious mania and family values culminating in an incredible monologue delivered by Michael Park’s charismatic church leader. Latterly descends into a chaotic siege thriller shoot-em-up with crazy cultists versus the American authorities led by the always excellent, John Goodman. Smith’s trademark chitty-chatter dialogue is good, but kind of gets in the way (monologue aside) of the drama and humanity-as-horror of the piece. Mark: 7 out of 11.

THERE’S SOMEONE IN YOUR HOUSE (2021)

Extremely well written, directed and acted film which gets stuck between the rites-of-passage and slasher tropes, serving neither of these genres satisfactorily. There’s some alright kills, but overall feels like an inferior photocopy of Scream (2000) with little of the wit or meta-brilliance. Mark: 6 out of 11.

TIN & TINA (2023)

Featuring motifs relating to religion, fascism and family values, this interesting chiller ticks all the themes present in many Spanish horror films. As Lola (Milena Smit) and Adolfo (Jaime Lorente) suffer the tragedy of a lost child, they try to redeem their grief with the adoption of two blonde, shock-haired orphans raised by nuns. Driven by their naivete and religious fervour, Tin and Tina end up committing many questionable acts which threaten to send Lola over the edge. Beautifully filmed and scored, the director also builds an impressive sense of dread throughout, yet the film is ultimately denied a higher mark by the glacial pace and disappointing ending. Nonetheless, it is thought provoking with both the creepy kids and Christianity contributing to nail-biting scenes of high anxiety. Mark: 7 out of 11