Written and directed by Colin Cairnes and Cameron Cairnes
Produced by Mat Govoni, Adam White, John Molloy, Roy Lee, Steven Schneider and Derek Dauchy
Cast: David Dastmalchian, Laura Gordon, Ian Bliss, Fayssal Bazzi, Ingrid Torelli, Rhys Auteri, Georgina Haig, and Josh Quong Tart
Cinematography: Matthew Temple
*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***
Some years ago I wrote an article about how I dislike the found footage sub-genre and that article can be found here. Occasionally, found footage is used well such as in Creep (2014) with Mark Duplass or REC (2007) or Chronicle (2012). Now you can add Colin Cairnes and Cameron Cairnes, Late Night With the Devil (2023) to that list of found footage films I actually enjoyed.
Technically, one could argue it isn’t really found footage and it negates such films often “amateurish” filming methods, with a truly stylish rendition of 1970’s television chat shows. However, we are asked by the narrator to view “never-before-seen” images and sounds from a previously unreleased and infamous TV chat show presented by ‘Night Owls’ host, Jack Delroy (David Dastmalchian). So, found footage it is!
David Dastmalchian is absolutely fantastic in his role as ambitious but desperate to be number-one chat show host, Jack Delroy. Often cast in supporting roles he now grabs the chance to become much more than that scene-stealing character actor. Delroy is not unlikable, but his arrogance and ambition dominate his personality. So much so, and despite his grief at losing his wife to cancer, he is prepared to allow all sorts of creepy and inappropriate situations unfold in his desperate search for TV ratings.
Delroy pits a dubious psychic Christou (Fayssal Bazzi) against skeptical former magician Carmichael the Conjurer (Ian Bliss), before asking parapsychologist author June Ross-Mitchell (Laura Gordon), and her subject Lilly D’Abo (Ingrid Torelli) to contact a demonic presence called ‘Mr Wriggles,’ live on television. Even after Christou is rushed to the hospital and Lilly contorts and spits out growling obscenities, Delroy decrees the show must go on. The Cairnes Brothers then continue to ratchet up the tension and horror to a deadly and shocking ‘Night Owls’ televisual denouement.
With echoes of the recent Inside No. 9 (3×3 quiz show episode) and BBC show Ghostwatch (1992), and of course The Exorcist (1973), Late Night With the Devil (2023) is one of the most enjoyable horror films I have seen in sometime. The 1970’s period setting and TV studio location is impressively recreated by the fantastic production team, especially on a relatively low budget. Arguably, the plot, once you dig down into it lacks emotional depth, however, the pacy and darkly funny screenplay more than compensates for this. Overall, the film’s style, design, direction and a commanding performance from Dastmalchian ensure Late Night With the Devil (2023) is essential viewing for all horror fans.
INFERIS (2024) – A new horror short poster and stills.
After a few years gap I finally managed to get back into the short filmmaking process last year with INFERIS (2024).
I wrote and produced it as a very low-budget psychological horror proof of concept short.
It was filmed at Raindance Film School in August 2023 and post was completed in February 2024.
Here’s the poster:
Here are some stills:
If you haven’t seen it, the trailer is here:
INFERIS (2024) – Production Details
Tagline – “They make you work like hell!”
Logline – Recent prison leaver, Joseph Mann, begins a new job at Inferis Security. Hoping for a fresh start he finds himself drawn toward a mysterious door that leads to god knows where.
After a few years gap I finally managed to get back into the short filmmaking process last year with INFERIS (2024). I wrote and produced it as a very low-budget psychological horror proof of concept short. It was filmed at Raindance Film School in August 2023 and post was completed in February 2024.
Here is the trailer:
INFERIS (2024) – Production Details
Tagline – “They make you work like hell!”
Logline – Recent prison leaver, Joseph Mann, begins a new job at Inferis Security. Hoping for a fresh start he finds himself drawn toward a mysterious door that leads to god knows where.
Written by Jonathan Glazer – based on The Zone of Interest by Martin Amis
Produced by James Wilson, Ewa Puszczyńska
Main cast: Christian Friedel, Sandra Hüller, Imogen Kogge, etc.
Cinematography by Łukasz Żal
Sound Designer: Johnnie Burns
Music by Mica Levi
Jonathan Glazer is not the most prolific of directors, so when he releases a film it provides powerful cinematic coffee to wake up the cultural senses. His last film, the mesmeric Under The Skin (2013), is one of the most original of the century for me and once again with, The Zone of Interest (2023), Glazer has determined to take a provocative approach to cinematic form, style and themes.
I usually advise near the top of my reviews that the piece may contain spoilers. However, there is so little plot in The Zone of Interest (2023), that is difficult to give anything away. The depth of the story comes from the intellectual approach to cinematic form and the wartime setting, with a narrative based on Martin Amis’ novel about the Holocaust and specifically, the concentration camp, Auschwitz. But Glazer only hints at such Nazi barbarism as the point of view of the film is presented solely from the commandant Rudolf Hoss’ (Christian Friedel) and his family’s perspective. Glazer and his outstanding production team deny us sight of the death and torture from within the Hoss house and garden.
Glazer and his sound designer, Johnnie Burns, employ powerful aural style to incredible effect as screams, tools smashing, gun shots and shouting pierce the screen throughout. Mica Levi’s minimalist score also punches through to startle too. Further, as the Hoss family, notably his spoilt children and privileged wife (Sandra Huller) go about their everyday business puffs of smoke billow over their garden as they remain unimpacted by what is occurring outside. Glazer also uses negative film processing, gliding tracking shots and metronomic editing from multi-camera set-ups to stylistic devices to break the fourth wall and to reinforce the everyday routine where all is not what it seems.
One may argue Glazer’s film is experimental and anti-narrative. I rarely cared about the Hoss family and not enough of the Auschwitz inmates is seen to raise one’s emotions. Thus, The Zone of Interest (2023) is a cold and intellectual film to absorb. Yet, I would argue that it is not experimental because Glazer is so in control of the filmmaking process. His creative choices and results are delivered in an extremely confident way. Certainly I felt that the film was more anti-drama than anti-narrative or experimental. For those looking for a more conventional addition to the war film genre could be disappointed.
Ultimately, The Zone of Interest (2023) is a horror film with the barbarism hidden. As the murder and genocide are occurring, the Hoss family unit remain unmoved by such atrocities. From a safe distance the audience watch them attend parties, tend their vegetables, feed their children, eat their dinner, play games and sunbathe. Is Glazer asking if we as humanity are complicit in our privileged comfortable homes while horrors go on around us in the world? Is this Nazi version of the Garden of Eden a metaphor for the world as a whole now? Does a lack of action or inaction to known crimes make one complicit? There are no easy answers, but it gets you thinking. Just like this highly intellectual and expertly constructed work of cinema.
Screenplay by David Matalon, Sasha Perl-Raver & Jen D’Angelo
Story by David Matalon & Sasha Perl-Raver
Produced by Jason Blum, Adam Hendricks & Greg Gilreath
Cast: Kiernan Shipka, Olivia Holt, Charlie Gillespie, Lochlyn Munro, Troy L. Johnson, Liana Liberato, Kelcey Mawema, Stephi Chin Salvo, Anna Diaz, Ella Choi, Jeremy Monn-Djasgnar, Nathaniel Appiah, Jonathan Potts, Randall Park, Julie Bowen, etc.
Cinematography by Judd Overton
*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***
Here’s a thing that rarely happens, I actually watched a trailer and thought, “Hey, that film looks really entertaining, so I am going to watch it now.” That trailer was for Totally Killer (2023) which is currently streaming on Amazon Prime. The story is essentially Back to the Future (1985) meets Scream (1996), but the hilarious and pacey screenplay wears it’s influences proudly and even cleverly name-checks those two classic examples of the time-travel and slasher sub-genres.
Based in the present day, Totally Killer (2023) is set in the small town Vernon, USA. The film opens with a Vernon podcaster and tour guide revealing how the horrific “Sweet 16 Killer” struck killing three teenage girls in 1987. Unfortunately, the murderer suddenly reappears and kills again. In a frenetic chase through the house, Pam Hughes (Julie Bowen) battles the 1980’s masked slicer, but unfortunately she meets her demise. In grief from the death of her mother is sparky teenager, Jamie Hughes (Kiernan Shipka), and she finds solace with her friend Amelia (Kelcey Mawema), who happens to be designing a time machine as a science project. Well, what do you know!! Jamie finds herself being attacked by the “Sweet 16 Killer” and somehow goes sent back to 1987. There she has a chance to investigate the original crime and perhaps save her mum from being murdered in the future.
Even as I write this basic synopsis of the opening act I realise Totally Killer (2023) seems so contrived and derivative, but I found it to be an absolute blast. The script is clever and knowing with energetic and fun characters. Kiernan Shipka as Jamie is especially brilliant with great comedy timing and delivery. The filmmakers embrace the joy of time-travel and horror film tropes, and there’s also some excellent set-pieces involving the obligatory 1980’s false-faced psycho with a grudge. Moreover, the “fish-out-of-time” gags which derive from Jamie’s reactions to the 1980’s people, fashion and moral attitudes are a real joy. I was smiling and laughing throughout. Yet, significantly this film also deftly balances the suspense, action, horror and science-fiction aspects brilliantly. Stranger Things gets a lot of critical acclaim for stealing wholesale from Stephen King’s back catalogue. Totally Killer (2023) blatantly borrows permanently from everything and for me remains one of the consistently entertaining films of 2023.
As an alternative to the usual Christmas films that are on our TVs, streaming platforms and cinemas now, I have spent the last few weeks watching many recent horror film releases. Like a big, black Christmas stocking I present to you some quick reviews of said bloody entertainment with the usual marks out of 11.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and your family!
BIRDBOX BARCELONA (2023)
Spanish sequel to the Netflix original and it’s not quite as good. Some excellent filmmaking and deadly set-pieces are hamstrung by poor structure and over-familiarity with the central alien-suicide concept. The themes of religion, sacrifice and guilt are well explored and the pacey death rate make it worth watching though.
Mark: 6.5 out of 11
BULL (2021)
Brutal British B-movie with Neil Maskell on deadly form as a vengeful career criminal killing off his former gang members after they left him for dead. There are better revenge films out there, but there is some bone-crushing gore to please horror fans like me.
Mark: 6 out of 11
THE CLOVEHITCH KILLER (2018)
Slow-paced but suspenseful rites-of-passage-horror with Charlie Plummer’s teenager suspecting his father (Dylan McDermott) may be a notorious serial killer. Inspired by the evil crimes of BTK murderer, Dennis Rader, this compels throughout until the slightly unbelievable ending.
Mark: 7.5 out of 11
CONTAINMENT (2015)
Low-budget British horror-thriller set in a tower block during a viral outbreak and deadly lock-down. A prescient and chilling film which finds authorities attempting to stop the contagion by all means necessary. Some nail-biting suspense ensues and decent ensemble cast drive a film where chaos and paranoia feel all too familiar to recent global events.
Mark: 7.5 out of 11
EL CONDE (2023)
Pablo Larrain’s horror-comedy-satire is based around a very funny one-joke premise. The gag is Chilean dictator General Pinochet was in fact a blood-sucking vampire draining the life out of the common people. After a really powerful and amusing opening twenty minutes, the film devolves into a Pinochet family drama that runs out of steam until the frankly insane ending which has to be seen to be believed.
Mark: 7 out of 11
EVIL DEAD RISE (2023)
Some fantastically horrific and bloody gore cannot save this Evil Dead reboot/sidequel from feeling both redundant and unnecessary. Contrived plot, paper-thin characters and so badly lit I could hardly see anything. I recommend you watch the original films or the series Ash versus Evil Dead instead, with the awesome Bruce Campbell kicking Deadite ass!
Mark: 6 out of 11
INFINITY POOL (2023)
Another off-the-chart offering from Brandon Cronenberg after the spectacularly grim sci-fi horror of Possessor (2020). Infinity Pool similarly deals with themes of alienation, identity and duality as a writer, portrayed by Alexander Skarsgard, ends up on the holiday from hell. With obnoxious characters and a screeching Mia Goth going full gonzo I almost turned this film off, but such is the misery heaped upon the privileged James Foster, I eventually felt sorry for this tortured narcissistic soul. Trippy and bloody thrills contrast the luxury of the beautiful coastal resort with Cronenberg convincing us there is only ever trouble in paradise.
Mark: 8 out of 11
LUTHER: FALLEN SUN (2023)
Idris Elba returns in this big budget Netflix film version of the BBC maverick cop drama. Stylish, moody and effective thriller with a scenery-chewing turn by Andy Serkis as the nemesis from hell. Favours pace and action over plot consistency, Elba is always excellent value for money even if the Luther character has always been quite slight. Serkis’ fiendish plan is written for shock value rather than actually making any sense.
Mark: 7 out of 11.
PEARL (2022)
Prequel to Ti West’s porno horror X (2022) (see mini-review below), this establishes the early years of Mia Goth’s eponymous anti-heroine, Pearl. As a young woman in 1918 she dreams of escaping and becoming a silent movie star. Yet her dominant mother cannot contain the passionate darkness within Pearl. I much preferred this stylish period and character horror to the exploitative and nasty X (2022). There remains much gruesome violence here but Mia Goth finally convinces me as Pearl, delivering one the best film monologues I have seen in some time.
Mark: 8 out of 11.
RENFIELD (2023)
This vampire story from the point-of-view of the familiar, Renfield, contains the most horrific filmmaking in the very worst way. With a hopeless script, terrible acting and bad CGI it wastes the talent of Nicholas Hoult and Awkwafina. While I expected Nicolas Cage’s Dracula to be over-the-top, the film direction is so tonally awful that I have to say this is one of the worst films I have seen all year.
Mark: 3 out of 11
THANKSGIVING (2023)
A very effective by-the-numbers grind-house slasher film from Eli Roth. Set around the eponymous American holiday period, a masked killer starts murdering a small town’s occupants a year after a Black Friday sale turns into a mall riot. The functional script and generic teenagers lack the spark of the classic Scream (1996), however, Thanksgiving (2023) has some highly imaginative murder scenes, with Roth respecting both the genre and audience. A bit more social satire about greedy capitalism would have raised my mark.
Mark: 7.5 out of 11.
VIOLENT NIGHT (2022)
Die Hard (1988) is NOT a Christmas movie, but a film set AT Christmas. Here Norwegian genre movie director, Tommy Wirkola, unofficially remakes Die Hard/Die Hard 2 (1990), with Santa (David Harbour) replacing John McClane fighting criminals and mercenaries robbing a rich businesswoman’s house. Wirkola made an even better version of the violent home invasion comedy inThe Trip (2021). But this rattles along, rings a lot of bells and crunches enough calcium and funny bones to make it worth a watch. David Harbour as Saint Nick sleighs us with his usual fine character acting work.
Mark: 7.5 out of 11.
X (2022)
I know he is a very well respected low-budget film director, and I should like Ti West’s work. Yet, for some reason, I have never enjoyed his previous horrors or Western that much. I feel like his previous films lack pace, contain unsympathetic characters and his horrors lack actual suspense. X (2022) finds a number of unlikable characters setting out to make a porno film on a rural farm, only to encounter danger lurking in the woods, lake and the farmhouse. I really wanted to enjoy this more than I did because Ti West has such control over exploitative material that delivers some genuinely sickening moments of horror. Mia Goth is the standout and West certainly casts her imaginatively, but I just did not connect with this expertly made Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) homage.
Produced by Emerald Fennell, Josey McNamara and Margot Robbie
Cast: Barry Keoghan, Jacob Elordi, Rosamund Pike, Richard E. Grant, Alison Oliver, Archie Madekwe, Carey Mulligan, Paul Rhys, etc.
Cinematography by Linus Sandgren
*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***
As the awards garnered upon Emerald Fennell’s brilliant Promising Young Woman (2020) will testify, she is clearly a major talent. Fennell has also acted in TV shows such as Call the Midwife and The Crown, as well as writing and producing the second series of Killing Eve. Not only is Fennell an excellent actress, writer, director and producer, but is also now an Oscar and BAFTA winner. Thus, Fennell’s “difficult second film” arrives in the guise of the pitch black comedy,Saltburn (2023). Although to describe this hilarious, bleak, sexy, and often twisted exploration of the British class system as such evidently tests the very definition of comedy.
Saltburn (2023) is set in 2006. Oliver Quick (Barry Keoghan) attends Oxford University as a naive fresher with an inferiority complex and desire for company. While he is incredibly intelligent, coming from a lower class background places bookish Oliver as a very small fish in big water. Especially when compared to the so-called Oxford elite including handsome and wealthy, Felix Catton (Jacob Elordi) and his cousin, the handsome and not-as-wealthy, Farleigh Start (Archie Madekwe). While Farleigh is suspicious of Oliver, Jacob soon befriends him and takes the Northerner under his wing. The two connect and form an “odd couple” bromance, with Felix even going so far as to invite Oliver to his stately home, Saltburn, for the summer. There we meet the rest of Felix’s family including his flaky sister, Venetia (Alison Oliver), eccentric father, Sir James (Richard E. Grant) and effervescent mother, Lady Elspeth (Rosamund Pike).
After building Oliver and Felix’s characters carefully during their time at Oxford, Fennell’s savage and satirical screenplay gathers pace in the second act at Saltburn. Here Oliver tries to fit in and ingratiate himself into the Catton family, but it soon becomes clear that however friendly they may be, he will only ever be an outsider to them. Simultaneously, Farleigh sees Oliver as a rival for the Cattons’ emotional and financial affections and the two begin a retaliatory personal war amidst the balmy summer days, breakfasts, dinner parties and social gatherings. Oliver’s main journey is to connect as much with Felix as possible, so much so his passion veers toward obsession. But Felix is a roaming spirit and a hedonist and does not quite requite Oliver’s feelings. Yet, Felix does show compassion for Oliver, as illustrated when he drives him on a mercy mission to visit Oliver’s family. This is where the story takes an intriguing and ever deadly turn.
I cannot recommend Saltburn (2023) enough for its fantastically witty script, devastatingly brilliant cast and some quite disgustingly explicit, but contextually justifiable, character moments and scenes. Fennell takes the setting and structure of Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited and turns it upside down, spinning a devious tale of infatuation, love, privilege and social climbing. Through the character Oliver Quick, and I really don’t want to give anything away, there is a powerful and jaw-dropping character arc of upward mobility. Rosamund Pike’s and Keoghan’s performances are both amazing and award-worthy. While the final act twists certainly do shock and surprise they arguably are rushed when compared with the more effective pacing of the opening and middle acts. Moreover, I am also unsure why the exquisite cinematography and stunning locations were presented in the 4:3 (1:33:1) aspect ratio. Why squeeze in Linus Sandgren’s light and framing and not expand them to the widescreen format?
Ultimately, Emerald Fennell proves herself an important voice in British cinema. Unafraid to test the boundaries of taste, genre, and audience expectations, she has crafted one of the most consistently challenging films of the year with Saltburn (2023). One could easily describe the themes presented here as a critique of the upper classes and how the uber-rich are bad people to be brought down to their knees. However, Fennell’s script is not that simplistic. It cleverly careers between love/hate for the characters and irony-bombing the class system, before becoming a damning indictment on the darkest flaws of humanity. Lest one forget the indelible one-liners throughout and THAT final dance sequence, which are both to die for!
Life and work have been extremely positive and busy of late, but I have still found time to watch a number of films during September. Here are some quick reviews of just a few of the ones I have seen.
** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS **
65 (2023)
How could a sci-fi-creature film with Adam Driver battling dinosaurs sixty-five million years ago be so uninspired? This probably would have been amazing with Arnold Schwarzenegger in the lead and John McTiernan directing in the nineties, but the limp father-daughter narrative propellent and severe lack of dinosaur carnage left me feeling disappointed.
Mark: 5 out of 11
CINEMA REVIEW: A HAUNTING IN VENICE (2023)
I love Agatha Christie and I love Poirot. The recent renditions from Kenneth Branagh have been mixed. Murder on the Orient Express (2017) was fantastic, especially for a very familiar murder mystery, while Death on the Nile (2022)was overcooked with a number of miscasts. A Haunting in Venice (2023) is a return to form and a real Halloween treat. The murder mystery isn’t the most interesting part as the plot points, apart from one decent twist, are mostly obvious. But the spooky lighting, eerie sound, imaginative use of lenses and camera angles, plus the claustrophobic and spooky atmosphere created within the Venetian palazzo are extremely impressive. I actually wanted more supernatural scares. The cast are great, although Tina Fey was glamorously miscast as the author, Ariadne Oliver. The ITV/David Suchet version was more faithful and had a better story, but I really enjoyed this excellent piece of comfort cinema.
Mark: 8 out of 11
APPLE TV REVIEW: CAUSEWAY (2022)
Jennifer Lawrence produces and stars as a U.S. soldier/engineer blown up in Afghanistan who, while suffering from PTSD, struggles to get her life back together in New Orleans. A lower-budget and lower key drama that clearly gave Lawrence a change of pace from the blockbusters she has been starring in for years. Causeway (2022) reminded me how great an actress Lawrence is and also, how brilliant Bryan Tyree Henry is. But the character study meanders with a lack of narrative drive, clarity and dynamism Lawrence showed inSilver Linings Playbook (2012). Indeed, while a worthy advocate for a soldier’s suffering, there wasn’t muchJoy (2015) to be found here.
Mark: 6.5 out of 11
SKY CINEMA REVIEW: DUNGEONS AND DRAGONS: HONOR AMONGST THIEVES (2023)
I missed this at the cinema as I was probably washing my hair at the time; what there is of it. However, this latest uber-budgeted attempt to breathe life into the table-top-dice-throwing Dungeons and Dragons game is actually really entertaining. Chris Pine, Michelle Rodriguez and Hugh Grant lead the energetic cast in a series of fantastically funny and frenetic action set-pieces involving magic, monsters, wizards, castles, stolen booty and of course, dragons. Pine and Grant are always very watchable, but Michelle Rodriguez steals the film with smashing physicality and deadpan humour as the barbarian, Holga Kilgore. The script has many fine gags throughout, as the likeable characters and pacey heist plot rip along wonderfully. You cannot go wrong with a ragtag group of outsiders finding community while fighting against a pernicious foe. Well, actually you can. But, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves (2023) does not!
Mark: 8 out of 11
DISNEY+ REVIEW: NO ONE WILL SAVE YOU (2023)
Kaitlyn Dever’s Brynn exists in a town where no one seems to speak to her or each other. But suddenly the place is overrun with aliens and Brynn must fight for her life while still not uttering a word. Hmmmm. . . in between the no dialogue cinematic contrivance becoming a bit of a bore, Brian Duffield’s excellent B-movie has some terrific action and a committed lead performance from the sensational Kaitlyn Dever. Since her breakthrough appearance in Short Term 12 (2013), she has gone from strength-to-strength as a performer. As a work of pure suspense cinema the film works mostly because of a weaponised Dever, the dynamic camerawork and the cracking sound and editing. However, the story has a number of holes, especially toward the end, which is frankly ridiculous. But Brian Duffield is a very talented writer and director and it is great that he strived for some formal originality in a familiar genre. Even though there was (yes I know it raises the tension) no organic narrative reason for the lack of speech throughout.
Cast: Sophie Wilde, Alexandra Jensen, Joe Bird, Otis Dhanji, Miranda Otto, Zoe Terakes, Chris Alosio, Marcus Johnson, Alexandria Steffensen, etc.
Cinematography: Aaron McLisky
*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***
A cold paw of death, stiff fingers, rotting black nails, gripped by a living hand and opening a portal, a link to the other side to make contact with lost spirits. What does the hand represent or symbolise in terms of contemporary subtext? Is it mobile phones? Or social media? Or is it just a creepy device with which to layer chills and suspense and scare teenagers on a Friday night at the cinema. Does a horror film have to have a deeper meaning as long as it scares us?
Saw (2004), Paranormal Activity (2007), The Blair Witch Project (1999), Night of the Living Dead (1968) and most recently, Get Out (2017), are low budget horror films which became breakout box office hits. Similarly, to Peele’s debut chiller, Talk To Me (2022), is at the higher echelon of “low” budget cinema costing circa $4 million to produce. Yet, it has given A24 its biggest hit to date thanks to a nifty premise, impressive young cast, and compelling direction from yet another filmmaking sibling duo in Danny and Michael Philippou.
The film takes the phrase “talk to the hand” literally as a bunch of dopey Aussie teens play party games for kicks by connecting with the afterlife through a disembodied hand. Before you can say, “Candyman, Candyman, Candyman!” the ghost has decided they don’t want to return home and chooses to remain with the living. I hate it when that happens! Cue all sorts of creepy and unsettling shenanigans.
The emotional core of this overfamiliar ghoulish tale is represented in the grieving teen angst of Sophie Wilde’s Mia. In attempting to overcome the recent passing of her father, Mia leaves herself open to the torment of the nefarious spirits. So, once she has shook the dead hand at a party she is suddenly connected with her dead father’s spirit. Or is she cursed by something altogether more evil. What do you think?
For all the over-used tropes within Talk to Me (2022) is a very suspenseful and scary film. While Wilde’s acting is slightly overwrought, her character is the least irritating of the dumb teenage protagonists not thinking through the consequence of their actions. Thematically it is quite strong as it explores the nature of grief and how it impact one’s mental health. My one main criticism of the production was Aaron McLisky’s cinematography was too dark, even for a horror film. Nonetheless, the hand itself is an iconic prop, and will no doubt lead to a slew of most likely inferior franchised sequels.
Based on: American Prometheus by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin
Produced by: Emma Thomas, Charles Roven, Christopher Nolan
Cast: Cillian Murphy, Emily Blunt, Matt Damon, Robert Downey Jr., Florence Pugh, Josh Hartnett, Casey Affleck, Rami Malek, Kenneth Branagh, Tom Conti and many more.
Cinematography: Hoyte van Hoytema
*** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS ***
One wonders if Christopher Nolan sees himself reflected, on some subconscious level, in the character of J. Robert Oppenheimer. Both are geniuses within their chosen field, and both have had their critics who do not always agree with their choices. The intrinsic difference is that the work of Oppenheimer and his team of scientists created one of the most expensive and deadly weapons the world has even seen. His actions led to destruction and death on a mass scale. Christopher Nolan, on the other hand, merely creates expensive drama and destruction on a cinema screen for our entertainment.
J. Robert Oppenheimer is clearly a complex character to bring to life on the screen. Indeed, scientists are not always the most riveting of characters, nor particularly cinematic. Especially since they spend their days in laboratories, classrooms and have their heads buried in books. Thus, visually speaking it is a constant challenge for filmmakers to present such biopic narratives. Moreover, thematically, and philosophically there is much internal conflict to wrestle with. Especially someone as (in)famous as Oppenheimer. I mean, how does a man overcome the guilt of being responsible for the deaths of so many people?
Having said that, Oppenheimer, as the leader of the ‘Manhattan Project’ at Los Alamos, could also be interpreted as the saviour of lives. The invention of nuclear weapons is an act of aggression, but paradoxically also a shield of peace. Such is the fear generated by such a devastating tool we will never know how many lives the existence of nuclear bombs has saved. Unfortunately, human beings find other ways to kill each other. That sadly will never stop. Does Nolan explore these themes within the intense three hours of cinematic propulsion, Oppenheimer (2023)? It is certainly there in the subtext, but perhaps not as pronounced as I would have hoped.
Adapting American Prometheus by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin, Christopher Nolan’s screenplay is highly intelligent and clearly professionally researched. It is also, when compared with the often-baffling Tenet (2020), simply structured. Events from Oppenheimer’s early life, post-war troubles with the United States government and the key stages of the ‘Manhattan Project’ are cut together in juxtaposing timelines throughout the lengthy running time. Nolan builds from the Senate and court hearings Oppenheimer faces after the war, where his security status is threatened with revocation due to his alleged association with the Communist party before the war.
That McCarthyistic-Red-Scare-paranoia was vilifying genuine heroes such as Oppenheimer is quite incredible, but unsurprising. I mean, here is a man, who served his country to personal cost and his own mental degradation. It is therefore a measure of his character, as presented via Cillian Murphy’s formidable portrayal, that he refuses to break in the face of constant questioning of his patriotism and commitment to America. I felt that the constant jolts from the Senate hearings, where Robert Downey Jnr’s, Lewis Strauss, is seeking election, to Oppenheimer’s security status “trial,” brought about an overly repetitive and talky series of scenes which bogged down the emotions for me.
Where the film truly blooms is when Oppenheimer makes his scientific breakthrough, builds his team of geniuses and the construction and testing of the nuclear weapons at Los Alamos. There is palpable suspense (even though we know what happens) in the race with the Germans to make the bomb first. Imagine if the Germans had won the race? It does not bear thinking about. The history of the world would have been irrevocably altered beyond comprehension. Nolan also does an effective job of keeping the scientific language at an understandable level, as he promotes personalities over jargon. Indeed, Nolan’s ultra-talented ensemble cast including Matt Damon, Rami Malek, Josh Hartnett, Dane DeHaan, Jason Clarke, Florence Pugh and the best of the lot, Robert Downey Jnr, are all superbly marshalled by the director.
As well as being rich in history and thematic power,Oppenheimer’s (2023) visuals, allied with Hoyte Van Hoytema’s pristine cinematography, are unsurprisingly impressive. Nolan makes the choice to switch between black-and-white and colour photography. This is initially jarring but works with the shifting character perspectives it is intended to denote. On the other hand, I would say the pulsating sound design and score felt overbearing at times. Similarly, one could argue the overload of cutting, aural battering and switching of film colour stock combine to overload the viewer and remove emotional and dramatic resonance.
Oppenheimer (2023) is another Nolan masterwork as he and Cillian Murphy will surely get Oscar nominations. Lastly, the film works best as a bullet-pointed history lesson, a fine tribute to a complex and flawed genius, and a powerful damnation of United States paranoid politics. However, the solipsist nature of Oppenheimer’s character study and crowd of talking heads often becomes dizzying, watering down the drama and emotion of this immaculate and nuclear work of cinema.
The Cinema Fix presents 